“In too many states, judicial elections are becoming political prizefights where partisans and special interests seek to install judges who will answer to them instead of the law and the constitution.”

Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 2007

Dark money is campaign funding from undisclosed donors. Through dark money campaign contributions, special interest groups have been injecting large sums of money into Wisconsin’s judicial races. Corporate special interests want our courts to serve them instead of the people of Wisconsin. 

dollar bills

To deliver on the promise of equal justice for all, states should require state court judges to publicly disclose their financial assets and activities–including campaign contributions they receive and campaign spending on their behalf. 

This information would make it easier to identify a judge’s potential conflict of interest in a case.

Background & History

The result has been a flood of money into campaigns.

Most state judges are elected in a way that lacks safeguards to protect their independence from special interests or political pressure, threatening their ability to apply the law fairly and without fear of retaliation.

In elections for the Wisconsin Supreme Court, money from within and from outside the state has risen dramatically over the past 20 years. In 2003, during the race between Pat Roggensack and Ed Brunner, outside groups spent $27,200. In 2020, outside spending reached $5 million in the race between Jill Karofsky and Dan Kelly. Pat Roggensack is set to retire in 2023.   

This money also affects our courts at other levels, as illustrated by this graph of Court of Appeals race spending.

How many millions of dollars do you think will be spent by outside groups in the 2023 election?